Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For example, "If I started studying three days ago, instead of last night, I could have done better on my test." Since people often think about what they could have done differently, it is not uncommon for people to feel regret during upward counterfactual thinking. Downward counterfactual thinking focuses on how the situation could have been ...
"Build a better mousetrap, and the world will beat a path to your door" is a metaphor about the power of innovation. It originated, in a somewhat different form, with Ralph Waldo Emerson . [ 1 ] [ 2 ] The epigram as known today, which specifies "mousetrap", probably also originated with Emerson, although the evidence for this is indirect.
Proving that this is the best of all possible worlds would dispel such charges by showing that, no matter how it may intuitively appear to us from our limited point of view, any other world – such as, namely, one without the evils which trouble our lives – would, in fact, have been worse than the current one, all things considered. [2]
Basically, the point is, it could have been worse, and of course it could have been a lot better." Backer still hasn't decided whom he is going to vote for this fall, as Trump hasn't really given ...
In retrospect, perhaps America would have been better served if the 46th president Joe Biden won a second term. Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., is a senior advisor at the Atlantic Council and the prime ...
The MoSCoW method is a prioritization technique used in management, business analysis, project management, and software development to reach a common understanding with stakeholders on the importance they place on the delivery of each requirement; it is also known as MoSCoW prioritization or MoSCoW analysis.
In February the USDA said the cost of eggs, already up nearly 37% from last year, could rise up to 20% due to shortages from the outbreak. Best egg alternatives, substitutes as USDA predicts 41% ...
If one believes the phrase to imply sequentiality, then the "eat-have" variant could be seen as a more logical form: you cannot eat your cake and then (still) have it, but you actually can have your cake and then eat it. Thus, "can't eat and (then) have" would be a correct statement, "can't have and (then) eat" would be an incorrect statement.