Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
After the 5th Circuit denied a stay pending appeal, the federal government sought a stay from the Supreme Court on July 8, 2022. On July 21, 2022, the court denied the application for stay in a 5–4 vote, but granted certiorari before judgment and set the case for argument in the December sitting. [2]
United States v. Texas, 599 U.S. ___ (2023), a case in which the Supreme Court considered whether the states have Article III standing to challenge the legality of the Department of Homeland Security's guidelines for the enforcement of civil immigration law. United States v. Texas, a case in which the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ...
The existence of a remedy for the violation is implied from the importance of the right that is violated. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, 407 U.S. 297 (1972) Government officials must obtain a warrant before beginning electronic surveillance even if domestic security issues are involved. The ...
Last week, a Texas woman sued her home state for the right to obtain an abortion in a new kind of challenge to the bans that most Republican-controlled states have begun enforcing in the last year ...
A substantial number of Americans may believe states ought to allow abortion late in pregnancy as a form of prenatal euthanasia or that a small increase in the overall risk of a third or fourth C ...
Clay v. United States: 403 U.S. 698 (1971) Since the Appeal Board gave no reason for the denial of a conscientious objector exemption, petitioner's conviction must be reversed New York Times Co. v. United States: 403 U.S. 713 (1971) Freedom of the press, national security, Pentagon Papers: Reed v. Reed: 404 U.S. 71 (1971)
Federal Republic of Germany v. United States, 526 U.S. 111 (1999) Medellín v. Dretke, 544 U.S. 660 (2005) Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008) Leal Garcia v. Texas, 564 U.S. 940 (2011) – Courts cannot stay an execution on the grounds that Congress might eventually enact a statute to enforce an international law.
Issue 1 is a power grab to 'own the libs.' There should be a super majority. Letters to the Editor: The constitution already has enough 'fluff, minutia.' Issue 1 is a power grab to 'own the libs.'