Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Examples given by the court included geriatric patients and those with anxiety disorders, whose state of mind may prohibit understanding the true reality of low-risk treatments which are safe and provide an advantage to the patient and therefore therapeutic privilege should 'extend to cases where although patients have mental capacity, their ...
An example might be a prison doctor refusing to treat a prisoner because he or she had previously been difficult or abusive. Although proof of spite or ill-will may make a decision-maker's act unlawful, actual malice in the sense of an act intended to do harm to a particular individual, is not necessary.
The judge disagreed and informed the jury that the doctors could be held guilty if their prescribing practices deviated from medical norms to the extent that they were unrecognizable as medicine. The jury ultimately found that the two doctors were guilty under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). [1] Ruan and Couch appealed to the United States Court of ...
The claimant was a woman of small stature and a diabetic under the care of a doctor during her pregnancy and labour. [2] The doctor did not inform her of the 9-10% risk of shoulder dystocia, where the baby's shoulders are unable to pass through the pelvis among diabetic women as she viewed the problem being very slight and believed a caesarean section was not in the claimant's interest.
The Court of Appeals affirmed the earlier decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, which was filed under the caption Conant v. McCaffrey . [ 3 ] Though the case involved chronic patients with untreatable diseases, the decision does not name these conditions as a prerequisite, nor does it limit drugs ...
Physician–patient privilege is a legal concept, related to medical confidentiality, that protects communications between a patient and their doctor from being used against the patient in court. It is a part of the rules of evidence in many common law jurisdictions. Almost every jurisdiction that recognizes physician–patient privilege not to ...
An involuntarily committed, legally competent patient who refused medication had a right to professional medical review of the treating psychiatrist's decision. The Court left the decision-making process to medical professionals. 14th 1990 Washington v. Harper: Prisoners have only a very limited right to refuse psychotropic medications in prison.
American Medical Association, 895 F.2d 352, 7th Cir. 1990). [3] The plaintiffs petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review their case against JCAHO and ACP. On June 11, 1990, the Supreme Court denied certiorari. [4] The plaintiffs then petitioned the Supreme Court for rehearing; the Supreme Court denied rehearing on August 13, 1990.