Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 798 (/ ˈ r uː t ə m /) is an English land law and English contract law case, concerning the measure and availability of damages for breach of negative covenant in circumstances where the court has confirmed that a covenant is legally enforceable and refused, as unconscionable, to issue an order for specific performance or an ...
The process of introducing a consent decree begins with negotiation. [5] One of three things happens: a lawsuit is filed and the parties concerned reach an agreement prior to adjudication of the contested issues; a lawsuit is filed and actively contested, and the parties reach an agreement after the court has ruled on some issues; or the parties settle their dispute prior to the filing of a ...
Criminal liability of chief executive officer of a corporation for the misdeeds of the company Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores: 421 U.S. 723 (1975) Private damages actions under Rule 10b-5 is confined to actual purchasers or sellers of securities: Bigelow v. Virginia: 421 U.S. 809 (1975) First Amendment and commercial speech: Cort v. Ash ...
Homeowners across the U.S. are being targeted in a sophisticated scam in which callers pose as mortgage lenders to defraud people out of hundreds of thousands of dollars, the Federal ...
An FBI agent reported in a 2022 memorandum that Costa gambled $373,700 worth of chips with cash and bet a million at the Seminole Hard Rock Casino near Hollywood from 2020 through most of 2021.
A contract attorney is a lawyer who works on legal cases on a contract basis. Such work is generally of a temporary nature, often with no guaranteed employment term. A contract attorney is An attorney temporarily hired by the law office for a specific job or period. When the job or period is finished, the relationship is over. —
Open fields near Lisbon, Ohio.. The open-fields doctrine (also open-field doctrine or open-fields rule), in the U.S. law of criminal procedure, is the legal doctrine that a "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Lester B. Orfield, A Resume of Decisions of the United States Supreme Court on Federal Criminal Procedure, 30 Ky. L.J. 360 (1942). Lester B. Orfield, A Resume of Decisions of the United States Supreme Court on Federal Criminal Procedure, 7 Mo. L. Rev. 263 (1942).