Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Thecodontia (meaning 'socket-teeth'), now considered an obsolete taxonomic grouping, was formerly used to describe a diverse "order" of early archosaurian reptiles that first appeared in the latest Permian period and flourished until the end of the Triassic period. All of them were built somewhat like crocodiles but with shorter skulls, more ...
Thecodont dentition is a morphological arrangement in which the base of the tooth is completely enclosed in a deep socket of bone, as seen in crocodilians, dinosaurs and mammals, and opposed to acrodont and pleurodont dentition seen in squamate reptiles. [1]
von Huene (1936) named Rauisuchus in a list of the Thecodontia, [5] but no diagnosis or description was given, so it remained a nomen dubium until being properly described by von Huene (1942). [ 3 ]
Thecodontia is a paraphyletic group, and its usage as a taxonomic category has been rejected under modern cladistic systems. The name Archosauriformes is intended as a monophyletic replacement compatible with modern taxonomy.
The thecodont condition was historically used to define a clade, the Thecodontia, which is now considered paraphyletic and thus obsolete. [7] angular The angular is a dermal bone of the lower jaw. In lateral view, it covers a larger area of the posteroventral region of the jaw, being located behind the dentary and below the surangular.
Older definitions of the group Archosauria rely on shared morphological characteristics, such as an antorbital fenestra in the skull, serrated teeth, and an upright stance. Some extinct reptiles, such as proterosuchids and euparkeriids , also possessed these features yet originated prior to the split between the crocodilian and bird lineages.
This did not change when Richard Owen coined the term Dinosauria in 1842, because Owen did not recognise Thecodontosaurus as a dinosaur; in 1865, he assigned it to the Thecodontia. It was not until 1870 that Thomas Huxley became the first person to understand that it was a dinosaur, though referring it incorrectly to the Scelidosauridae. [18]
Erythrosuchids were formerly classified as thecodonts of the suborder Proterosuchia.This classification is no longer used by paleontologists, who now employ a cladistic approach.