Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In law, ex parte (/ ɛ k s ˈ p ɑːr t eɪ,-iː /) is a Latin term meaning literally "from/out of the party/faction [1] of" (name of party/faction, often omitted), thus signifying "on behalf of (name)". An ex parte decision is one decided by a judge without requiring all of the parties to the dispute to be present.
ex parte: from [for] one party A decision reached, or case brought, by or for one party without the other party being present. ex post: from after Based on knowledge of the past. ex post facto: from a thing done afterward Commonly said as "after the fact." ex post facto law
In law, inter partes (Law Latin for 'between the parties' [1]) is a legal term that can be distinguished from in rem, which refers to a legal action whose jurisdiction is based on the control of property, or ex parte, which refers to a legal action that is by a single party.
South African family law is concerned with those legal rules in South Africa which pertain to familial relationships. [1] It may be defined as "that subdivision of material private law which researches, describes and regulates the origin, contents and dissolution of all legal relationships between: (i) husband and wife (including the parties to a civil union); (ii) parents, guardians (and ...
In the 1866 case Ex parte Garland, the Supreme Court held that "the power thus conferred is unlimited, with the exception stated." That power, the Court said, "extends to every offence known to ...
Ex Parte Estate Davies 1957 (3) SA 471 (N). The Law of South Africa. 2nd Ed. LexisNexis. 2003. Volume 31. Paras 224, 240, 325 & 326. The Law of South Africa. Volume 31. Butterworths. Durban and Pretoria. 1988. Paras 158 and 171. pp 103, 119 & 160. H R Hahlo and Ellison Kahn.The Union of South Africa: The Development of Its Laws and Constitution.
Ex parte Mitsuye Endo, 323 U.S. 283 (1944), was a United States Supreme Court ex parte decision handed down on December 18, 1944, in which the Court unanimously ruled that the U.S. government could not continue to detain a citizen who was "concededly loyal" to the United States. [1]
In the name of justice, and law and order, Parson should not ignore rulings at the local, state and federal level that found the former detective’s actions culpable in Lamb’s death.