enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: ontario constitutional rights violations attorneys

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Toronto (City) v Ontario (Attorney General) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_(City)_v_Ontario...

    By a 5–4 majority, the court held that the Government of Ontario's decision to reduce the size of the Toronto City Council in the middle of 2018 municipal election campaign did not violate either section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or the unwritten principle of democracy.

  3. Section 24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_24_of_the_canadian...

    Overall, section 24's "competent jurisdiction" limit on which courts may award remedies, in R. v. 974649 Ontario Inc. (2001), was taken as meaning that while Charter rights are generous, they exist within a framework set up by Parliament and the provincial governments. These elected governments have the authority to grant varying degrees of ...

  4. List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (McLachlin Court)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Supreme_Court_of...

    Constitutional entitlement to social assistance Chamberlain v Surrey School District No 36 [2002] 4 S.C.R. 710, 2002 SCC 86 December 20, 2002 Religion in schools; school board book selections Siemens v Manitoba (AG) [2003] 1 S.C.R. 6, 2003 SCC 3 January 30, 2003 Criminal law power; constitutionality of ban on video lottery terminals

  5. Section 11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_11_of_the_Canadian...

    This right has generated some case law, as courts have struck down reverse onus clauses as violating the presumption of innocence. This first occurred in R. v. Oakes (1986) in respect to the Narcotics Control Act. This was also the case in which the Court developed the primary test for measuring rights limitations under section 1 of the Charter ...

  6. Halpern v Canada (AG) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halpern_v_Canada_(AG)

    Halpern v Canada (AG), [2003] O.J. No. 2268 is a June 10, 2003 decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in which the Court found that the common law definition of marriage, which defined marriage as between one man and one woman, violated section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

  7. Freedom of expression in Canada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_expression_in...

    The complaint against Steyn and Maclean's magazine, which excerpted the book when it was published in 2006, was heard before three human rights commissions: Ontario's, which declared it lacked jurisdiction; [25] British Columbia's, which dismissed the complaint; [26] and the Canadian Human Rights Commission, which dismissed the federal ...

  8. Pawtucket officials searched lockers at the fire station. Now ...

    www.aol.com/pawtucket-officials-searched-lockers...

    “The uniform practice, custom, and policy among the members of the Pawtucket Fire Department is that personal lockers are private; no one accesses a firefighter’s personal locker without his ...

  9. Section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_10_of_the_Canadian...

    Section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms specifies rights upon arrest or detention, including the rights to consult a lawyer and the right to habeas corpus. As a part of a broader range of legal rights guaranteed by the Charter, section 10 rights may be limited by the Oakes test and/or the notwithstanding clause. However ...

  1. Ads

    related to: ontario constitutional rights violations attorneys