Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In C++, the Standard Template Library (STL) provides the set template class, which is typically implemented using a binary search tree (e.g. red–black tree); SGI's STL also provides the hash_set template class, which implements a set using a hash table. C++11 has support for the unordered_set template class, which is implemented using a hash ...
Due to their usefulness, they were later included in several other implementations of the C++ Standard Library (e.g., the GNU Compiler Collection's (GCC) libstdc++ [2] and the Visual C++ (MSVC) standard library). The hash_* class templates were proposed into C++ Technical Report 1 (C++ TR1) and were accepted under names unordered_*. [3]
similar to a set, multiset, map, or multimap, respectively, but implemented using a hash table; keys are not ordered, but a hash function must exist for the key type. These types were left out of the C++ standard; similar containers were standardized in C++11, but with different names (unordered_set and unordered_map). Other types of containers ...
In an unordered list, one simple heuristic for decreasing average search time is the move-to-front heuristic, which simply moves an element to the beginning of the list once it is found. This scheme, handy for creating simple caches, ensures that the most recently used items are also the quickest to find again.
Added in C++20. Provides the class template std::span, a non-owning view that refers to any contiguous range. <stack> Provides the container adapter class std::stack, a stack. <unordered_map> Added in C++11 and TR1. Provides the container class template std::unordered_map and std::unordered_multimap, hash tables. <unordered_set> Added in C++11 ...
This page was last edited on 6 December 2011, at 12:57 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
In computer science, selection sort is an in-place comparison sorting algorithm.It has a O(n 2) time complexity, which makes it inefficient on large lists, and generally performs worse than the similar insertion sort.
Key uniqueness: in map and set each key must be unique. multimap and multiset do not have this restriction. Element composition: in map and multimap each element is composed from a key and a mapped value. In set and multiset each element is key; there are no mapped values. Element ordering: elements follow a strict weak ordering [1]