Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Reducing any functional dependency will change the content of S. Sets of functional dependencies with these properties are also called canonical or minimal. Finding such a set S of functional dependencies which is equivalent to some input set S' provided as input is called finding a minimal cover of S': this problem can be solved in polynomial ...
Interface injection, where the dependency's interface provides an injector method that will inject the dependency into any client passed to it. In some frameworks, clients do not need to actively accept dependency injection at all. In Java, for example, reflection can make private attributes public when testing and inject services directly. [30]
A database relation (e.g. a database table) is said to meet third normal form standards if all the attributes (e.g. database columns) are functionally dependent on solely a key, except the case of functional dependency whose right hand side is a prime attribute (an attribute which is strictly included into some key).
An example of such a language is SQL, though it is one that Codd regarded as seriously flawed. [2] The objectives of normalization beyond 1NF (first normal form) were stated by Codd as: To free the collection of relations from undesirable insertion, update and deletion dependencies.
A trivial multivalued dependency X Y is one where either Y is a subset of X, or X and Y together form the whole set of attributes of the relation. A functional dependency is a special case of multivalued dependency. In a functional dependency X → Y, every x determines exactly one y, never more than one.
There is a functional dependency from the candidate key to all the attributes in the relation. The superkeys of a relation are all the possible ways we can identify a row. The candidate keys are the minimal subsets of each superkey and as such, they are an important concept for the design of database schema .
In this example, {Manufacturer country} is the functionally dependent attribute which will be removed. Place those partial dependency-dependent attributes (i.e. {Manufacturer country}) in a relation where their corresponding determinant attributes are a candidate key (i.e. {Manufacturer}).
(Dependency injection is an example of the separate, specific idea of "inverting control over the implementations of dependencies" popularised by Java frameworks.) [4] Inversion of control is sometimes referred to as the "Hollywood Principle: Don't call us, we'll call you".