Ads
related to: plyler entry systems
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982), was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States struck down both a state statute denying funding for education of undocumented immigrant children in the United States and an independent school district's attempt to charge an annual $1,000 tuition fee for each student to compensate for lost state funding. [1]
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in 1982 in Plyler v. Doe that states cannot deny students an education on account of their immigration status, allowing students to gain access to the United States' public schooling system. [5] This case is known as being one of the first cases to establish legal "rights" for immigrant education in ...
In order to comply with Plyler, education policy analysts have suggested that schools may not: deny admission to a student on the basis of undocumented status; treat a student fundamentally differently from others when determining residency; engage in practices that frighten undocumented students and their families away from school access;
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
In 1982, the Supreme Court forbade schools to deny services based on illegal immigration status in Plyler v. Doe . In 1986, Reagan signed the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), which forbade hospitals from denying emergency care services based on immigration status.
The court did not alter, modify, or overrule the holdings of Plyler, rather it clarified what those findings were. Some degree of the confusion which is occuring here, I think, is a basic misunderstanding on your part about Plyler. The part of Plyler which appears to contradict Verdugo-Urquidez is dicta (it is, afterall, in a footnote).
Ads
related to: plyler entry systems