Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Hundreds of companies reacted positively to the Supreme Court decision by temporarily modifying their company logos on social media to include rainbows or other messages of support for the legalization of same-sex marriage. [160] Jubilant supporters went to social media, public rallies, and Pride parades to celebrate the ruling.
United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013), is a landmark United States Supreme Court civil rights case [1] [2] [3] concerning same-sex marriage.The Court held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which denied federal recognition of same-sex marriages, was a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Windsor and Obergefell v. Hodges decision on June 26, 2023 in Washington, D.C. ... Hawaii legalized same-sex marriage two years before the Supreme Court mandated it, yet a section remained in the ...
U.S. District Judge David L. Bunning ordered Davis jailed for contempt of court for refusing to follow his order to issue marriage licenses in compliance with the Supreme Court decision.
The Biden administration asked the Supreme Court to reverse the ruling, arguing that because Muñoz and Asencio Cordero could choose to live outside the U.S., her right to marriage had not been ...
The DOJ did so on July 3, while asking the Supreme Court to review Golinski as well. [81] The Commonwealth of Massachusetts filed a response to both petitions adding the Spending Clause and Tenth Amendment issues as questions presented. [n 3] The Supreme Court denied these petitions on June 27, 2013, following its decision in Windsor.
MANual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day, 370 U.S. 478 (1962), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that magazines consisting largely of photographs of nude or near-nude male models are not considered "obscene" within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1461, which prohibits the mailing of obscene material. [2]