Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
You can clarify what someone said if you don’t understand or didn’t hear it correctly, which is polite because it prevents misunderstandings and miscommunications. Other ways to say this are:
Pre-existing biases can lead to listening to someone else's argument for its weaknesses, ignoring its strengths. This can lead to a competitive advantage in a political debate, or by a journalist to provoke a strong response from an interviewee, and is known as "ambushing". Individuals in conflict often blindly contradict each other.
{{Non sequitur}} to mark individual mentions of someone or something in an out-of-context way, the relevance of which is unclear; When using these templates, be specific: mark individual phrases, sentences, and sections in preference to entire articles. Also be sure to leave specific suggestions for improvement on the article's talk-page.
To write that someone insisted, speculated, or surmised can suggest the degree of the person's carefulness, resoluteness, or access to evidence, even when such things are unverifiable. To say that someone asserted or claimed something can call their statement's credibility into question, by emphasizing any potential contradiction or implying ...
She or he prompts participants to elaborate on their responses and to build on what others have said. The leader guides participants to deepen, clarify, and paraphrase, and to synthesize a variety of different views. [14] The participants share the responsibility with the leader to maintain the quality of the Socratic circle.
She asked him to clarify what he had based his claims on. In response Mr Afzal said that “dozens of police officers” had told him that Home Office Circular 17/2008 “had supporting guidelines ...
Listening for ways someone can reject you. [7] Forming your response to the speaker instead of focusing on what is being said. Preoccupation, when there is too much on the mind of the listener, so that they cannot listen. [8] Preexisting familiarity with the topic of conversation, which results in less effort to actively listen.
Meta said on Tuesday it would change its fact-checking program in the U.S., leading Brazilian prosecutors to demand that it clarify whether the changes would also apply to the South American country.