enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Chomsky–Foucault debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChomskyFoucault_debate

    Foucault maintained that in adopting a certain conception of human nature we risk reconstituting old power relations in a post-revolutionary society, to which Chomsky replied: "Our concept of human nature is certainly limited, partial, socially conditioned, constrained by our own character defects and the limitations of the intellectual culture ...

  3. For Reasons of State - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/For_Reasons_of_State

    For Reasons of State is a 1973 collection of political essays by Noam Chomsky ... Louis (July 3, 1973). "For Reasons of State 'by Noam Chomsky' (Book Review)". ...

  4. The Responsibility of Intellectuals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Responsibility_of...

    In February 2017, on the 50th anniversary of the essay's publication, a conference was held at University College London. [4] In 2019, a book based on this conference was published entitled, The Responsibility of Intellectuals: Reflections by Noam Chomsky and others after 50 years and edited by three Chomsky biographers, Nicholas Allott, Chris Knight and Neil Smith. [5]

  5. Foucauldian discourse analysis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucauldian_discourse_analysis

    Foucault presents the hypothesis that, in every society, the production of discourses is controlled with the aim of: 1. exorcising its powers and dangers; 2. reducing the force of uncontrollable events; 3. hide the real forces that materialize the social constitution. To this end, he theorizes that external or internal procedures are used. [9]

  6. Noam Chomsky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky

    Chomsky's famous 1971 debate on human nature with the French philosopher Michel Foucault was a symbolic clash of the analytic and continental philosophy traditions, represented by Chomsky and Foucault, respectively. [99] It showed what appeared to be irreconcilable differences between two moral and intellectual luminaries of the 20th century.

  7. Political positions of Noam Chomsky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of...

    Chomsky is often described as one of the best-known figures of the American Left, although he doesn't agree with the usage of the term.He has described himself as a "fellow traveller" to the anarchist tradition, and refers to himself as a libertarian socialist, a political philosophy he summarizes as challenging all forms of authority and attempting to eliminate them if they are unjustified ...

  8. Objectivity and Liberal Scholarship - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivity_and_Liberal...

    Chomsky argues that the conservative, moderate, and liberal intelligentsia all had an elite, counter-revolutionary, bias in their writing, but he focuses on the liberal scholars. As an additional example to the Vietnam War, Noam Chomsky looks at liberal scholarship which covered the Spanish Civil War in which the same lack of objectivity and ...

  9. Biopower - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biopower

    Biopower (or biopouvoir in French), coined by French social theorist Michel Foucault, [1] refers to various means by which modern nation states control their populations.In Foucault's work, it has been used to refer to practices of public health, regulation of heredity, and risk regulation, among many other regulatory mechanisms often linked less directly with literal physical health.