enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Argument from authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

    An argument from authority [a] is a form of argument in which the opinion of an authority figure (or figures) is used as evidence to support an argument. [1] The argument from authority is a logical fallacy, [2] and obtaining knowledge in this way is fallible. [3] [4]

  3. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Appeal to authority (argument from authority, argumentum ad verecundiam) – an assertion is deemed true because of the position or authority of the person asserting it. [75] [76] Appeal to accomplishment – an assertion is deemed true or false based on the accomplishments of the proposer.

  4. Argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

    In the argument above, the statement, "Fred's cat has fleas" is up for debate (i.e. is a claim), but in the explanation, the statement, "Fred's cat has fleas" is assumed to be true (unquestioned at this time) and just needs explaining. [19] Arguments and explanations largely resemble each other in rhetorical use.

  5. Arguments from authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Arguments_from_authority&...

    move to sidebar hide. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  6. Talk:Argument from authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Argument_from_authority

    One needs to carefully read the sources that are centred on the subject. An article in which an expert in some area criticizes another expert in a related area because he uses "an argument from authority" is not necessarily centred on the subject. The source needs to be about fallacies and ideally directly on the subject of argument from authority.

  7. Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2013 November 7

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/...

    Argument from authority notes that "any appeal to authority used in the context of deductive reasoning" is fallacious. Can't there be any exceptions? The following argument is obviously deductive, and it seems to me to be valid: What the Tsar thinks "evil" is illegal in Russia The Tsar thinks that it's evil to eat peanut-butter sandwiches

  8. Courtier's reply - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtier's_reply

    A key element of a courtier's reply, which distinguishes it from an otherwise valid response that incidentally points out the critic's lack of established authority on the topic, is that the respondent never shows how the work of these overlooked experts invalidates the arguments that were advanced by the critic.

  9. Fallacy of authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Fallacy_of_authority&...

    This page was last edited on 12 February 2020, at 13:50 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.