Ads
related to: so far comma or not in order to add time to a numberIt’s an amazing resource for teachers & homeschoolers - Teaching Mama
- Interactive Stories
Enchant young learners with
animated, educational stories.
- Educational Songs
Explore catchy, kid-friendly tunes
to get your kids excited to learn.
- Activities & Crafts
Stay creative & active with indoor
& outdoor activities for kids.
- Digital Games
Turn study time into an adventure
with fun challenges & characters.
- Interactive Stories
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Except on pages that are inherently time-sensitive and updated regularly (e.g. the "Current events" portal), terms such as now, today, currently, present, to date, so far, soon, upcoming, ongoing, and recently should usually be avoided in favor of phrases such as during the 2010s, since 2010, and in August 2020.
There are a number of reasons for this rule, including: In general, though not as a rule, articles on a topic closely related to one part of the English-speaking world are more likely to be read by people from that part of the English-speaking world. It is courteous to your readers to adopt a style they are likely to be familiar with.
The comma between day and year is regulated by the template translator, to adapt to the preference. The trailing comma is not modified. So if you include the comma, it will also appear in the day-month-year or year-month-day styles, in which it is incorrect. So it seems there is no solution yielding always correct results.
The difference between an Oxford comma and a regular comma is that an Oxford comma refers to the final comma in a series that would come before the last conjunction of a sentence.
Presumably, the script mistook "34" for the year (even though it was hyphenated) and sought to remove the comma where it would not belong in DMY format; however, the comma is needed to separate the age from the date where this might otherwise be confusing to parse the sentence. I assume this is too advanced for the script to distinguish.
Second, the MoS is a guideline, not policy, so no one should be changing people's commas or quotation marks. Even though when I last looked the MoS advocated the use of the serial comma, I never add serial commas to British-related articles (although the serial comma is used in the UK, there are lots of British writers who don't like them).
This sentence is a bit different; however, a comma is necessary as well. Using commas to offset certain adverbs is optional, including then, so, yet, instead, and too (meaning also). So, that's it for this rule. or; So that's it for this rule. A comma would be appropriate in this sentence, too. or; A comma would be appropriate in this sentence too.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Ads
related to: so far comma or not in order to add time to a numberIt’s an amazing resource for teachers & homeschoolers - Teaching Mama