Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The philosopher Torkel Franzén, in a book on logic, states, "Euclid's proof that there are infinitely many primes is not an indirect proof [...] The argument is sometimes formulated as an indirect proof by replacing it with the assumption 'Suppose q 1, ..., q n are all the primes'. However, since this assumption isn't even used in the proof ...
In mathematics, particularly in number theory, Hillel Furstenberg's proof of the infinitude of primes is a topological proof that the integers contain infinitely many prime numbers. When examined closely, the proof is less a statement about topology than a statement about certain properties of arithmetic sequences.
In mathematics, Euclid numbers are integers of the form E n = p n # + 1, where p n # is the nth primorial, i.e. the product of the first n prime numbers. They are named after the ancient Greek mathematician Euclid, in connection with Euclid's theorem that there are infinitely many prime numbers.
When two primes have a difference of 2, they’re called twin primes. So 11 and 13 are twin primes, as are 599 and 601. Now, it's a Day 1 Number Theory fact that there are infinitely many prime ...
It leads to another proof that there are infinitely many primes: if there were only finitely many, then the sum-product equality would also be valid at =, but the sum would diverge (it is the harmonic series + + + …) while the product would be finite, a contradiction.
Euclid showed that there are infinitely many prime numbers. An important question is to determine the asymptotic distribution of the prime numbers; that is, a rough description of how many primes are smaller than a given number.
The Euclid–Mullin sequence is an infinite sequence of distinct prime numbers, in which each element is the least prime factor of one plus the product of all earlier elements. They are named after the ancient Greek mathematician Euclid , because their definition relies on an idea in Euclid's proof that there are infinitely many primes , and ...
In 1954 Carlitz gave a simple proof of the weaker result that there are in general infinitely many irregular primes. [7] Metsänkylä proved in 1971 that for any integer T > 6, there are infinitely many irregular primes not of the form mT + 1 or mT − 1, [8] and later generalized this. [9]