Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
(The Center Square) – A unanimous ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court may pave the way for challenges to a federal deportation plan under the incoming Trump administration to be defeated. The ...
National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration: 21A244 2022-1-13 The Court grants the applications to stay the Occupational Safety & Health Administration’s challenged rule mandating that employers with at least 100 employees require covered workers to receive a COVID-19 vaccine.
Many of the Biden administration's immigration policies have been subject to protracted litigation. Shortly after taking office in January 2021, the administration directed the U.S. immigration agency, ICE, to stop all deportations except those that posed a threat to "national security, public safety, and border security". The act was widely ...
Associate Justice: Samuel Alito: George W. Bush: January 31, 2006 83.1% 49/59 4 8 0 4 16 Associate Justice: Sonia Sotomayor: Barack Obama: August 6, 2009 70% 42/60 7 4 0 8 19 Associate Justice: Elena Kagan: Barack Obama: August 7, 2010 70% 42/60 7 3 0 2 12 Associate Justice: Neil Gorsuch: Donald Trump: April 7, 2017 78.3% 47/60 6 10 0 5 21 ...
Not all Supreme Court decisions are ultimately influential and, as in other fields, not all important decisions are made at the Supreme Court level. Many federal courts issue rulings that are significant or come to be influential, but those are outside the scope of this list.
Associate Justice: Samuel Alito: George W. Bush: January 31, 2006 82.1% 55/67 6 8 1 4 19 Associate Justice: Sonia Sotomayor: Barack Obama: August 6, 2009 67.6% 46/68 6 6 3 5 20 Associate Justice: Elena Kagan: Barack Obama: August 7, 2010 73.5% 50/68 6 1 0 4 11 Associate Justice: Neil Gorsuch: Donald Trump: April 7, 2017 86.8% 59/68 6 8 2 3 19 ...
Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court, has written roughly 100 opinions in more than three years on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The case was then returned to the lower courts for additional proceedings determining whether the Biden administration's action was "arbitrary and capricious" in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, which governs how federal agencies develop and issue regulations.