enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Monarchian Prologues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchian_Prologues

    The prologues are, however, of no value as a historical source for the evangelists' backgrounds. They rely on the biblical text itself and various unreliable traditions as sources. [6] The earlier anti-Marcionite prologue to Luke was a source, but not the other two anti-Marcionite prologues. [7]

  3. Template:Books of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Books_of_the_Bible

    Afrikaans; العربية; বাংলা; Bosanski; Català; ChiTumbuka; Cymraeg; Ελληνικά; فارسی; Frysk; Galego; 한국어; Bahasa Indonesia; Jawa; Latina

  4. File : Start of the 'Monarchian' prologue to the Apocalyse ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Start_of_the...

    This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details may not fully reflect the modified file.

  5. Template:Books of the Bible/doc - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Template:Books_of_the_Bible/doc

    This is a documentation subpage for Template:Books of the Bible. It may contain usage information, categories and other content that is not part of the original template page. See also

  6. Anti-Marcionite prologues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Marcionite_Prologues

    The anti-Marcionite prologues are three short prefaces to the gospels of Mark, Luke and John. No prologue to Matthew is known. They were originally written in Greek, but only the prologue to Luke survives in the original language. All three were translated into Latin and are preserved in some 40 manuscripts of the Vulgate Bible. [2]

  7. Open Scripture Information Standard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Scripture_Information...

    The schema is very similar to that of the Text Encoding Initiative, though on the one hand much simpler (by omission of many unneeded constructs), and on the other hand adding much more detailed metadata, and a formal canonical reference system to identify books, chapters, verses, and particular locations within verses.

  8. Alexandrian text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandrian_text-type

    In textual criticism of the New Testament, the Alexandrian text-type is one of the main text types. It is the text type favored by the majority of modern textual critics and it is the basis for most modern (after 1900) Bible translations. Over 5,800 New Testament manuscripts have been classified into four groups by text type.

  9. Western text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_text-type

    In textual criticism of the New Testament, the Western text-type is one of the main text types. It is the predominant form of the New Testament text witnessed in the Old Latin and Syriac translations from the Greek , and also in quotations from certain 2nd and 3rd-century Christian writers, including Cyprian , Tertullian and Irenaeus .