Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A presentence investigation report (PSIR) is a legal document that presents the findings of an investigation into the "legal and social background" of a person convicted of a crime before sentencing to determine if there are extenuating circumstances which should influence the severity or leniency of a criminal sentence.
Criminal investigation is an applied science that involves the study of facts that are then used to inform criminal trials. A complete criminal investigation can include searching , interviews , interrogations , evidence collection and preservation, and various methods of investigation. [ 1 ]
The office of New York Attorney General Letitia James also opened an investigation into Mr Brooks's death. ... Mr Brooks was serving a 12-year sentence for first-degree assault, according to the ...
Sentences are typically determined by a judge, in a separate hearing, after the jury (or other finder of fact) has issued findings of fact and a guilty verdict. In some cases after the probation department has carried out a pre-sentence investigation.
On Dec. 9, nearly halfway through a 12-year prison sentence for first-degree assault, ... Investigation opened into officers' use of force. Officials had been investigating Brooks' death, ...
An obstruction finding adds two levels to the offender's sentence, which can result in as much as an additional 68 months of prison. [17] In 2017, the obstruction enhancement was applied in 1,319 cases, representing 2.1 percent of all sentences issued in federal courts.
People v. Trump Court New York Supreme Court Full case name The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump Submitted March 30, 2023 Started April 15, 2024 Decided May 30, 2024 Verdict Guilty on all counts Charge First-degree falsifying business records (34 counts) Citation IND-71543-23 Case history Subsequent action Sentence of unconditional discharge Court membership Judge sitting ...
A criminal investigation resulted in fines and three-year prison sentences for three executives of ADM who colluded with the other companies to fix prices. The other four companies settled with the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division in September through December 1996.