Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Principia Ethica was influential. [13] [22] Clive Bell considered that through his opposition to Spencer and Mill, Moore had freed his generation from utilitarianism. [23] Principia Ethica was the bible of the Bloomsbury Group, [23] [24] and the philosophical foundation of their aesthetic values.
Among Moore's most famous works are his Principia Ethica, [20] and his essays, "The Refutation of Idealism", "A Defence of Common Sense", and "A Proof of the External World". Moore was an important and admired member of the secretive Cambridge Apostles, a discussion group drawn from the British intellectual elite. At the time another member, 22 ...
The open-question argument is a philosophical argument put forward by British philosopher G. E. Moore in §13 of Principia Ethica (1903), [1] to refute the equating of the property of goodness with some non-moral property, X, whether natural (e.g. pleasure) or supernatural (e.g. God's command).
The term was introduced by British philosopher G. E. Moore in his 1903 book Principia Ethica. [2] Moore's naturalistic fallacy is closely related to the is–ought problem, which comes from David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature (1738–40); however, unlike Hume's view of the is–ought problem, Moore (and other proponents of ethical non ...
According to William Frankena, Moore, in Ethics and Philosophical Studies, moves away from the version of consequentialism that he endorses in Principia Ethica. [9] Instead, Frankena suggests, the Moore of these later works may favour a form of consequentialism according to which there is a necessary connection between the promotion of goodness ...
UPS's announcement that it will cut back on deliveries for its largest customer, Amazon (), sent its stock tumbling as much as 15% on Thursday.But the company says it made the change with the goal ...
Image credits: Furious Thoughts You can also use Google Earth to explore the planet and various cities, locations, and landscapes using coordinates.The program covers most of the globe (97% back ...
The paradox of analysis (or Langford–Moore paradox) [1] is a paradox that concerns how an analysis can be both correct and informative. The problem was formulated by philosopher G. E. Moore in his book Principia Ethica, and first named by C. H. Langford in his article "The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy" (in The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, Northwestern ...