Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
AHF is a main opponent of Prop. 34, arguing it’s an unfair target of the ballot measure and that increasing rent control is core to its mission. What a ‘yes’ vote means
Proposition 34 would limit how certain healthcare providers spend revenues from a federal prescription drug program. The measure is an effort by the real estate industry to limit spending by the L ...
The AIDS Healthcare Foundation was the primary supporter and financial backer of this year's Proposition 33, as well as 2018 California Proposition 10, and 2020 California Proposition 21; all similar rent control proposals designed to overturn the Costa–Hawkins Rental Housing Act, which all failed with almost identical margins (60-40), while ...
Opponents call it a “revenge initiative.”
40 – Passed – The California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act of 2002. AB 1602. 41 – Passed – Voting Modernization Bond Act of 2002. (Shelley-Hertzberg Act). AB 56. 42 – Passed – Transportation Congestion Improvement Act. Allocation of Existing Motor Vehicle Fuel Sales and Use Tax Revenues ...
No formal argument was submitted against Prop. 6 in the state’s official voter information guide, but recent polling showed that it has struggled to gain majority support.
A coalition of law enforcement officials, murder victims’ family members, and wrongly convicted people launched the initiative campaign for the “Savings, Accountability, and Full Enforcement for California Act”, or SAFE California, Prop. 34. [3] If it had been passed by California voters on November 6, 2012, Prop. 34 would have replaced ...
34 Passed Requires health care providers that have spent over $100 million in any 10-year period on anything other than direct patient care, and operated multifamily housing with over 500 high-severity health and safety violations, to spend 98% of the revenues from federal discount prescription drug program on direct patient care.