Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The ACLU reports on its website that "The state Attorney General has 30 days [from the January 16, 2007 ruling] to decide whether to seek discretionary review by the North Carolina Supreme Court. If the North Carolina Supreme Court does not review the ruling by the Court of Appeals, then the case will go back to the superior court for a review ...
Heien v. North Carolina, 574 U.S. 54 (2014), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, ruling that a police officer's reasonable mistake of law can provide the individualized suspicion required by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution to justify a traffic stop. The Court delivered its ruling on December 15, 2014.
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission , 574 U.S. 494 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of immunity from US antitrust law . The Supreme Court held that a state occupational licensing board that was primarily composed of persons active in the market it regulates has immunity from ...
The seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina is seen in their courtroom at the Justice Building in Raleigh, N.C., Monday, May 9, 2022. ... On Sept. 18 the Supreme Court heard five SAFE Child ...
The state Supreme Court’s ruling will likely ease the process of obtaining law enforcement recordings, which for almost a decade has been subject to an uncommon carve-out in North Carolina law.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The Court found that there was nothing to sustain use of the procedure in either North Carolina statute or in the common law of that state. In considering the application of this type of motion to Klopfer's case, it noted that the initial indictment was within a month of the supposed offense, but that the State's motion was not granted until ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us