Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Some jurisdictions have banned the use of a telephone with camera functionality within a restroom or locker room in order to prevent this. The United States enacted the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2004 to punish those who intentionally capture an individual's genitalia without consent, when the person knew the subject had an expectation ...
It is unclear if a tort of invasion of privacy exists under Australian law. [4] The ALRC summarised the position in 2007: [2]: para 5.12, 5.14 "In Australia, no jurisdiction has enshrined in legislation a cause of action for invasion of privacy; however, the door to the development of such a cause of action at common law has been left open by the High Court in Australian Broadcasting ...
Hacking into someone else's computer is a type of intrusion upon privacy, [13] as is secretly viewing or recording private information by still or video camera. [14] In determining whether intrusion has occurred, one of three main considerations may be involved: expectation of privacy ; whether there was an intrusion, invitation, or exceedance ...
The campaign featured an online video, [164] a Censordyne product website [163] and a Censordyne search engine. [165] Within 24 hours of launch, the words GetUp and Censordyne were the number 2 and 3 most talked about brands on Twitter worldwide [citation needed]. The campaign received widespread coverage in most major Australian newspapers and ...
Playing a radio broadcast of a copyrighted work at a business was not copyright infringement Radio reception does not constitute a "performance" of copyrighted material. Reyher v. Children's Television Workshop: 533 F.2d 87: 2d Cir. 1976 The essence of infringement lies in taking not a general theme but its particular expression Gilliam v.
Miley Cyrus is facing a potential lawsuit accusing her song "Flowers" of taking elements from the Bruno Mars song "What I Was Your Man."
Iain Connor, a partner in Pinsent Masons, similarly said that the photographer could claim they had "put the camera in the hands of the monkey so [they had] taken some creative steps and therefore own the copyright," and that "if it's an animal that presses the button, it should be the owner of the camera that owns the copyright to that photo ...
Certain subject-matter in Australia is subject to various forms of government censorship. These include matters of national security, judicial non-publication or suppression orders, defamation law, the federal Racial Discrimination Act 1975, film and literature (including video game) classification, and advertising restrictions.