enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Journal ranking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_ranking

    Journal ranking is widely used in academic circles in the evaluation of an academic journal's impact and quality. Journal rankings are intended to reflect the place of a journal within its field, the relative difficulty of being published in that journal, and the prestige associated with it.

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    The Journal of 100% Reliable Factual Information might have a reputation for "predatory" behavior, which includes questionable business practices and/or peer-review processes that raise concerns about the reliability of their journal articles. [11] [12]

  4. Member check - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_check

    In qualitative research, a member check, also known as informant feedback or respondent validation, is a technique used by researchers to help improve the accuracy, credibility, validity, and transferability (also known as applicability, internal validity, [1] or fittingness) of a study. [2]

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable source examples - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_source...

    A number of questions should be considered when considering the reliability of an arXiv e-print: 1. Has the paper been accepted for publication in a peer reviewed journal? 2. Has the paper been cited in peer reviewed journals by other papers? 3. What are the qualifications of the paper’s authors? Do the authors possess degrees in relevant fields?

  6. Credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility

    Credibility dates back to Aristotle's theory of Rhetoric.Aristotle defines rhetoric as the ability to see what is possibly persuasive in every situation. He divided the means of persuasion into three categories, namely Ethos (the source's credibility), Pathos (the emotional or motivational appeals), and Logos (the logic used to support a claim), which he believed have the capacity to influence ...

  7. Inter-rater reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter-rater_reliability

    The range of the ICC may be between 0.0 and 1.0 (an early definition of ICC could be between −1 and +1). The ICC will be high when there is little variation between the scores given to each item by the raters, e.g. if all raters give the same or similar scores to each of the items.

  8. Construct validity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construct_validity

    Intervention studies where a group with low scores in the construct is tested, taught the construct, and then re-measured can demonstrate a test's construct validity. If there is a significant difference pre-test and post-test, which are analyzed by statistical tests, then this may demonstrate good construct validity. [23]

  9. Source credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_credibility

    Source credibility is "a term commonly used to imply a communicator's positive characteristics that affect the receiver's acceptance of a message." [1] Academic studies of this topic began in the 20th century and were given a special emphasis during World War II, when the US government sought to use propaganda to influence public opinion in support of the war effort.