Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Labour Appeal Court is a South African court that hears appeals from the Labour Court. The court was established by the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and has a status similar to that of the Supreme Court of Appeal. It has its seat in Johannesburg but also hears cases in Cape Town, Port Elizabeth and Durban.
The Southern African Legal Information Institute (SAFLII) is the largest online free-access collection of legislation and case law from South Africa and other jurisdictions in the South African region. SAFLII was formally created in 2002 as a joint project between the Australasian Legal Information Institute (AustLII) and the University of ...
On 16 August 2004, in a unanimous judgment written by Judge of Appeal Louis Harms, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal but amended the restraint ordered by the High Court, which it said was unduly broad. [5] Thereafter Laugh It Off lodged a final appeal in the Constitutional Court of South Africa, which heard argument on 8 March 2005. [6]
Pages in category "Labour Court of South Africa cases" The following 6 pages are in this category, out of 6 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. D.
Plascon-Evans Paints Ltd v Van Riebeeck Paints (Pty) Ltd [1] is an important case in South African law, particularly in the area of civil procedure and trade marks.. This appeal from a decision in the Cape Provincial Division was heard in the Appellate Division by Corbett JA, Miller JA, Nicholas JA, Galgut AJA and Howard AJA on February 27, 1984, with judgment handed down on May 21, 1984.
Brand found the test adopted by the court of whether or not the prosecutor's conduct was unreasonable not to be applicable; the critical point was whether his evidence, tested without the benefit of hindsight, could be rejected by the court. That finding allowed the appeal court to conclude that a causal link sufficient to support Van der Vyver ...
The court that decided the case. The name of the court can be wikilinked, like this: "[[Constitutional Court of South Africa|Constitutional Court]]". To have the template automatically indicate the court and jurisdiction of a case, type "courtname=auto". juris The jurisdiction that decided the case, such as "South Africa".
The issue of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation was not raised at this stage. The appeal against conviction was rejected, but the sentence was reduced to seven years. Geldenhuys appealed further to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA). The arguments made in the High Court were rejected by the SCA as they had been in the lower court.