Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The above process can be extended to eliminate all left recursion, by first converting indirect left recursion to direct left recursion on the highest numbered nonterminal in a cycle. Inputs A grammar: a set of nonterminals A 1 , … , A n {\displaystyle A_{1},\ldots ,A_{n}} and their productions
During the early stages of development, it was found that a production that is left-recursive can be transformed into a right-recursive production. [6] This modification significantly simplifies the task of a Packrat parser. Nonetheless, if there is an indirect left recursion involved, the process of rewriting can be quite complex and challenging.
For example, a grammar for a context-free language is left recursive if there exists a non-terminal symbol A that can be put through the production rules to produce a string with A (as the leftmost symbol). [2] [3] All types of grammars in the Chomsky hierarchy can be recursive and it is recursion that allows the production of infinite sets of ...
For a general method, see removing left recursion. A simple example for left recursion removal: The following production rule has left recursion on E E -> E '+' T E -> T This rule is nothing but list of Ts separated by '+'. In a regular expression form T ('+' T)*. So the rule could be rewritten as E -> T Z Z -> '+' T Z Z -> ε Now there is no ...
In computer science, a recursive descent parser is a kind of top-down parser built from a set of mutually recursive procedures (or a non-recursive equivalent) where each such procedure implements one of the nonterminals of the grammar. Thus the structure of the resulting program closely mirrors that of the grammar it recognizes. [1] [2]
A PEG is called well-formed [1] if it contains no left-recursive rules, i.e., rules that allow a nonterminal to expand to an expression in which the same nonterminal occurs as the leftmost symbol. For a left-to-right top-down parser, such rules cause infinite regress: parsing will continually expand the same nonterminal without moving forward ...
The C grammar [1] is not LL(1): The bottom part shows a parser that has digested the tokens "int v;main(){" and is about to choose a rule to derive the nonterminal "Stmt". Looking only at the first lookahead token "v", it cannot decide which of both alternatives for "Stmt" to choose, since two input continuations are possible. They can be ...
Context-free languages are a category of languages (sometimes termed Chomsky Type 2) which can be matched by a sequence of replacement rules, each of which essentially maps each non-terminal element to a sequence of terminal elements and/or other nonterminal elements.