Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A Mastermind player uses abduction to infer the secret colors (top) from summaries (bottom left) of discrepancies in their guesses (bottom right).. Abductive reasoning (also called abduction, [1] abductive inference, [1] or retroduction [2]) is a form of logical inference that seeks the simplest and most likely conclusion from a set of observations.
There are various types of non-deductive reasoning, like inductive, abductive, and analogical reasoning. [1] [59] Non-deductive reasoning is more common in everyday life than deductive reasoning. [60] Non-deductive reasoning is ampliative and defeasible.
Inductive reasoning refers to a variety of methods of reasoning in which broad generalizations or principles are derived from a set of observations. [1] [2] Unlike deductive reasoning (such as mathematical induction), where the conclusion is certain, given the premises are correct, inductive reasoning produces conclusions that are at best probable, given the evidence provided.
This theory of deductive reasoning – also known as term logic – was developed by Aristotle, but was superseded by propositional (sentential) logic and predicate logic. [citation needed] Deductive reasoning can be contrasted with inductive reasoning, in regards to validity and soundness. In cases of inductive reasoning, even though the ...
The classical model of scientific inquiry derives from Aristotle, [3] who distinguished the forms of approximate and exact reasoning, set out the threefold scheme of abductive, deductive, and inductive inference, and also treated the compound forms such as reasoning by analogy. [citation needed]
Deductive reasoning – Form of reasoning; Inductive reasoning – Method of logical reasoning; Entailment – Relationship where one statement follows from another; Epilogism; Analogy – Cognitive process of transferring information or meaning from a particular subject to another
Scientists use inductive reasoning to create theories and hypotheses. [29] Philip Johnson-Laird distinguished inductive from deductive reasoning, in that the former creates semantic information while the later does not . [27]: 439 In opposition, deductive reasoning is a basic form of valid reasoning. [29]
Reasoning may be subdivided into forms of logical reasoning, such as deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, and abductive reasoning. Aristotle drew a distinction between logical discursive reasoning (reason proper), and intuitive reasoning , [ 6 ] : VI.7 in which the reasoning process through intuition—however valid—may tend toward the ...