Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
On Friday at the Old Bailey, Kucharski was jailed for two-and-a-half years with a further year on extended licence for professing to be a member of a proscribed terrorist organisation.
On Friday at the Old Bailey in London, Kucharski was jailed for two-and-a-half years with a further year on extended licence for professing to be a member of a proscribed terrorist organisation ...
Section 12 support of a proscribed organisation - 10 years or a fine or both Section 13: "A person in a public place commits an offence if he (a)wears an item of clothing, or (b)wears, carries or displays an article, in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that he is a member or supporter of a proscribed ...
Seven men have been charged with attempted murder over the attack, with two were also charged with membership of a proscribed organization, the Irish Republican Army (IRA), a paramilitary group ...
Among the countries that publish a list of designated terrorist organizations, some have a clear established procedure for listing and delisting, and some are opaque. The Berghof Foundation argues that opaque delisting conditions reduce the incentive for the organization to abandon terrorism, while fuelling radicalism. [391]
Chapter 1: 'Terrorist Offences' makes provision for the amendment of and creation of new terrorist related offences under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act 2000.. Clause 1 makes it an offence to express an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation in circumstances where the perpetrator is reckless as to whether a person to whom the expression is directed will be ...
Per section one of the law, the text states that any images or articles must be done by a “proscribed organization” to be considered an offense. At no point does the law consider independent ...
Legal scholars Daphne Barak-Erez and David Scharia have identified a difference in approach between European and United States laws criminalizing incitement to terrorism; the former tend to focus on the content of the speech and whether it supports terrorist violence, while the latter focuses on whether the speaker is linked to proscribed organizations. [1]