enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of...

    This insight was the foundation of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. [5] Central ideas regarding the process of scientific investigation and discovery had been anticipated by Ludwik Fleck in Fleck (1935). [6] Fleck had developed the first system of the sociology of scientific knowledge. He claimed that the exchange of ideas led to the ...

  3. Sociology of the history of science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociology_of_the_history...

    The sociology of the history of science—related to sociology and philosophy of science, as well as the entire field of science studies—has in the 20th century been occupied with the question of large-scale patterns and trends in the development of science, and asking questions about how science "works" both in a philosophical and practical sense.

  4. Science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science

    Science is a systematic discipline that builds and organises knowledge in the form of testable hypotheses and predictions about the universe. [1] [2] Modern science is typically divided into two or three major branches: [3] the natural sciences (e.g., physics, chemistry, and biology), which study the physical world; and the behavioural sciences (e.g., economics, psychology, and sociology ...

  5. Sociology of scientific knowledge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociology_of_Scientific...

    The sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) is the study of science as a social activity, especially dealing with "the social conditions and effects of science, and with the social structures and processes of scientific activity." [1] The sociology of scientific ignorance (SSI) is complementary to the sociology of scientific knowledge.

  6. The Structure of Science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Science

    The Structure of Science is considered a classic work. [3] The book has been praised by philosophers such as Horace Romano Harré, Douglas Hofstadter, Alexander Rosenberg, Isaac Levi, Roger Scruton, and Colin Klein, [4] as well as by the historian Peter Gay and the economists H. Scott Gordon and Grażyna Musiał. [5]

  7. Community of inquiry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_of_inquiry

    education as knowledge transmission; knowledge as unambiguous, unequivocal and un-mysterious, knowledge is divided into non-overlapping disciplines; teachers as authoritative sources of knowledge. The reflective paradigm, in contrast, poses the following: education is the outcome of participation in a teacher-guided community of inquiry

  8. Models of scientific inquiry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Models_of_scientific_inquiry

    The philosopher Wesley C. Salmon described scientific inquiry: The search for scientific knowledge ends far back into antiquity. At some point in the past, at least by the time of Aristotle, philosophers recognized that a fundamental distinction should be drawn between two kinds of scientific knowledge—roughly, knowledge that and knowledge why.

  9. The Natural Ontological Attitude - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Natural_Ontological...

    Fine published "The Natural Ontological Attitude" [2] in 1984 and a sequel, "And Not Antirealism Either" [3] in the same year. His subject is the nature and validity of scientific knowledge and his goal is to get the reader to abandon either realism or antirealism as he understands them.