Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The law of agency is an area of commercial law dealing with a set of contractual, quasi-contractual and non-contractual fiduciary relationships that involve a person, called the agent, who is authorized to act on behalf of another (called the principal) to create legal relations with a third party. [1]
A main purpose of the project to develop IFRS 15 was that, although revenue is a critical metric for financial statement users, there were important differences between the IASB and FASB definitions of revenue, and there were different definitions of revenue even within each board's guidance for similar transactions accounting for under different standards. [3]
A Del Credere Agent not only establishes a privity of contract between the principal and the third party but also guarantees to the principal the due performance of the contract by the third party. The agent is liable, however, only when the third party fails to carry out their contract, e.g., by insolvency. The agent is not liable to the ...
In May 2014, the FASB and IASB issued new, converged guidance on revenue recognition. This guidance, known as ASC 606 (or IFRS 15), aims to improve consistency in recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. [3] ASC 606 became effective in 2017 for public companies and 2018 for private companies. [4]
In commercial law, a principal is a person, legal or natural, who authorizes an agent to act to create one or more legal relationships with a third party.This branch of law is called agency and relies on the common law proposition qui facit per alium, facit per se (from Latin: "he who acts through another, acts personally").
IFRS 15: IFRIC 14 IAS 19 - The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction 2007 January 1, 2008: IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate 2008 January 1, 2009: January 1, 2018: IFRS 15: IFRIC 16 Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation 2008 October 1, 2008: IFRIC 17
Wills J held that "the principal is liable for all the acts of the agent which are within the authority usually confided to an agent of that character, notwithstanding limitations, as between the principal and the agent, put upon that authority." This decision is heavily criticised and doubted, [4] though not entirely overruled in the UK.
The principal–agent problem typically arises where the two parties have different interests and asymmetric information (the agent having more information), such that the principal cannot directly ensure that the agent is always acting in the principal's best interest, particularly when activities that are useful to the principal are costly to ...