enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. A California Home Depot fired a 70-year-old woman who failed ...

    www.aol.com/finance/california-home-depot-fired...

    A 72-year-old California woman has sued Home Depot for age discrimination and wrongful termination after the retail giant fired her for failing to stop $5,000 in fraudulent transactions.

  3. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Mobility_LLC_v...

    AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...

  4. Man accused of duping churchgoers into investing in video ...

    www.aol.com/man-accused-duping-churchgoers...

    A man in the San Fernando Valley of California has agreed to plead guilty to wire fraud, after prosecutors accused him of running a multimillion-dollar Ponzi scheme targeting local Filipino ...

  5. US Supreme Court tosses case involving securities fraud suit ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-tosses-case...

    The justices, who heard arguments in the case on Nov. 6, dismissed Facebook's appeal of a lower court's ruling that allowed a 2018 class action led by Amalgamated Bank to proceed.

  6. Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franchise_Tax_Board_of...

    The ruling ended a long tax dispute between Gilbert Hyatt and California regarding alleged tax fraud by Hyatt. Hyatt had been challenging the tax fraud penalties that the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) had ordered him to pay since 1993, both in court and through administrative proceedings. Because of the Supreme Court ruling, Hyatt was ...

  7. FTC v. Actavis, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTC_v._Actavis,_Inc.

    FTC v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. 136 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that the FTC could make an antitrust challenge under the rule of reason against a so-called pay-for-delay agreement, also referred to as a reverse payment patent settlement.

  8. In a reversal, Donald Trump says he won't testify in his own ...

    www.aol.com/reversal-donald-trump-says-not...

    In an eleventh-hour reversal, former President Donald Trump announced Sunday he will not go back on the witness stand in the $250 million civil fraud trial against him and his company.

  9. List of overruled United States Supreme Court decisions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_overruled_United...

    The shortest period is 11 months, for the constitutional law Fourth Amendment (re: search and seizure) cases Robbins v. California, 453 U.S. 420 decision in July 1981, overruled by the United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 decision in June 1982.