enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Reynolds v. Sims - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_v._Sims

    Reynolds v. Sims , 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population.

  3. One man, one vote - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_man,_one_vote

    In addition to applying the Equal Protection Clause of the constitution, the U.S. Supreme Court majority opinion (5–4) led by Chief Justice Earl Warren in Reynolds v. Sims (1964) ruled that state legislatures, unlike the U.S. Congress, needed to have representation in both houses that was based on districts containing roughly equal ...

  4. Voting rights in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_rights_in_the...

    A historic turning point was the 1964 Supreme Court case Reynolds v. Sims that ruled both houses of all state legislatures had to be based on electoral districts that were approximately equal in population size, under the "one man, one vote" principle. [3] [4] [5] The Warren Court's decisions on two previous landmark cases—Baker v.

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Corn Products Refining Co. v. Commissioner: 350 U.S. 46 (1955) Hedging futures gains are ordinary if on raw materials United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp. 350 U.S. 332 (1956) contracts under the Natural Gas Act of 1938: Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co. 350 U.S. 348 (1956) contracts under the Federal Power Act ...

  6. Charles Morgan Jr. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Morgan_Jr.

    Charles "Chuck" Morgan Jr. (March 11, 1930 – January 8, 2009) was an American civil rights attorney from Alabama who played a key role in establishing the principle of "one man, one vote" in the Supreme Court of the United States decision in the 1964 case Reynolds v. Sims and represented Julian Bond and Muhammad Ali in their legal battles.

  7. Texas's at-large congressional seat - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas's_At-large...

    In the 1964 case of Reynolds v. Sims, the United States Supreme Court determined that the general basis of apportionment should be "one person, one vote." [5] This rule means that electoral districts, within reasonable bounds, must be equal in population according to the most recent census so that each person's vote is equally weighted.

  8. Ohio Issue 1: What is it, who is for it, and who is against it?

    www.aol.com/ohio-issue-1-against-035900672.html

    Oct. 15—OHIO — As Ohioans head to the polls this election season, a topic of discussion is Issue 1, a proposed constitutional amendment to overhaul the state's redistricting process. Both ...

  9. Wesberry v. Sanders - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesberry_v._Sanders

    Carr (1962) and Reynolds v. Sims (1964), it was part of a series of Warren Court cases that applied the principle of " one person, one vote " to U.S. legislative bodies. Article One of the United States Constitution requires members of the U.S. House of Representatives to be apportioned by population among the states, but it does not specify ...