Ad
related to: ohio unlawful vehicle use agreementuslegalforms.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Ohio v. Robinette , 519 U.S. 33 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car .
Byrd's lawyers submitted a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court in March 2017. The petition focused on the question of whether an otherwise well-established expectation of privacy for a driver of a car is nullified in the case of a rental car where the driver is not on the rental contract. [3]
The laws regulating driving (or "distracted driving") may be subject to primary enforcement or secondary enforcement by state, county or local authorities. [1]All state-level cell phone use laws in the United States are of the "primary enforcement" type — meaning an officer may cite a driver for using a hand-held cell phone without any other traffic offense having taken place — except in ...
The Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles (abbreviated BMV) is an agency of the Ohio Department of Public Safety that registers motor vehicles and issues license plates and driver's licenses in the U.S. state of Ohio. It is headquartered in the state capital, Columbus, and operates deputy registrar's offices and driver exam stations throughout the state.
The state also launched a new application, Ohio Mobile ID, to allow agencies and businesses that have to verify age to use a digital ID. Husted said the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles and Casino ...
Nov. 24—While discussing auto theft numbers earlier this month, the Albuquerque Police Department touted a new crime-fighting tool: the Grappler Police Bumper, a device used to stop fleeing ...
Oct. 5—Crashes have decreased in Ohio in the six months since the state passed a law increasing penalties for distracted driving, according to data from the Ohio State Highway Patrol. During the ...
Otherwise, lacking a warrant or the driver's consent, police may not search the vehicle, but under the plain-view doctrine may seize and use as evidence weapons or contraband that are visible from outside the vehicle. [10] As decided in Ohio v. Robinette (1996), after an officer returns the driver's identification, there is no requirement that ...
Ad
related to: ohio unlawful vehicle use agreementuslegalforms.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month