enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Section 11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_11_of_the_Canadian...

    The reference to a fair hearing allows one a right to "full answer and defence", a right also based in section 7 of the Charter ("fundamental justice"). This has led to a controversial string of decisions surrounding the rape shield law, starting with R. v. Seaboyer (1991) and ending with R. v. Mills (1999).

  3. Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_6_of_the_European...

    Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights is a provision of the European Convention which protects the right to a fair trial.In criminal law cases and cases to determine civil rights it protects the right to a public hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal within reasonable time, the presumption of innocence, right to silence and other minimum rights for those charged ...

  4. Presumption of innocence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence

    The presumption of innocence is a legal principle that every person accused of any crime is considered innocent until proven guilty.Under the presumption of innocence, the legal burden of proof is thus on the prosecution, which must present compelling evidence to the trier of fact (a judge or a jury).

  5. Presumption of guilt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_guilt

    In Director of Public Prosecutions v.Labavarde and Anor, Neerunjun C.J. said that article 11(1) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 6(2) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms would be infringed if "the whole burden is ... cast on the defence by the creation of a presumption of guilt on the mere preferment of the criminal charge".

  6. Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventh_Amendment_to_the...

    The Supreme Court in Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. Redman (1935) declared that the right of trial by jury thus preserved by the Preservation Clause is the right which existed under the English common law when the amendment was adopted. [24] "The amendment not only preserves that right, but discloses a studied purpose to protect it from ...

  7. images.huffingtonpost.com

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2007-09-20-Cornyn...

    images.huffingtonpost.com

  8. Canadian Bill of Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Bill_of_Rights

    The right to life, liberty and security of the person, and in another section, rights to fundamental justice (the Charter combines those rights in Section 7) The right to the enjoyment of property, which is not enshrined in the Charter; The right to counsel (now in Section 10 of the Charter). Section 2 of the Bill of Rights reads as follows: 2.

  9. Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_7_of_the_Canadian...

    First, there is the right to life, which stands generally as the basic right to be alive. Life has been thoroughly discussed by the Supreme Court in the 1993 case Rodriguez v British Columbia (AG). In that case, the Court denied that the section 7 right to bodily control could trump the right to life and thereby justify assisted suicide.