enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bias–variance tradeoff - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bias–variance_tradeoff

    In artificial neural networks, the variance increases and the bias decreases as the number of hidden units increase, [12] although this classical assumption has been the subject of recent debate. [4] Like in GLMs, regularization is typically applied. In k-nearest neighbor models, a high value of k leads to high bias and low variance (see below).

  3. Mean squared prediction error - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_squared_prediction_error

    The MSPE can be decomposed into two terms: the squared bias ... Bias-variance tradeoff; Mean squared error; Errors and residuals in statistics; Law of total variance;

  4. Generalization error - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalization_error

    This is known as the bias–variance tradeoff. Keeping a function simple to avoid overfitting may introduce a bias in the resulting predictions, while allowing it to be more complex leads to overfitting and a higher variance in the predictions. It is impossible to minimize both simultaneously.

  5. Ensemble averaging (machine learning) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ensemble_averaging...

    This is known as the bias–variance tradeoff. Ensemble averaging creates a group of networks, each with low bias and high variance, and combines them to form a new network which should theoretically exhibit low bias and low variance. Hence, this can be thought of as a resolution of the bias–variance tradeoff. [4]

  6. Random forest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_forest

    In particular, trees that are grown very deep tend to learn highly irregular patterns: they overfit their training sets, i.e. have low bias, but very high variance. Random forests are a way of averaging multiple deep decision trees, trained on different parts of the same training set, with the goal of reducing the variance.

  7. Overfitting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overfitting

    Underfitting is the inverse of overfitting, meaning that the statistical model or machine learning algorithm is too simplistic to accurately capture the patterns in the data. A sign of underfitting is that there is a high bias and low variance detected in the current model or algorithm used (the inverse of overfitting: low bias and high variance).

  8. Trump's policies may not prove inflationary, Bernanke, others say

    www.aol.com/news/trumps-policies-may-not-prove...

    A number of leading economists, including advisers to past U.S. presidents, have coalesced around the view that President-elect Donald Trump's plans to broaden tariffs, cut taxes and curb ...

  9. Supervised learning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supervised_learning

    But if the learning algorithm is too flexible, it will fit each training data set differently, and hence have high variance. A key aspect of many supervised learning methods is that they are able to adjust this tradeoff between bias and variance (either automatically or by providing a bias/variance parameter that the user can adjust).