Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Overall, we rate ScienceDirect Pro-Science based on publishing low-biased scientific research and studies. We also rate them High for factual reporting rather than Very High due to a failed fact check and the publication of open-access journals that are not always peer-reviewed.
ScienceDirect is a searcheable web-based bibliographic database, which provides access to full texts of scientific and medical publications of the Dutch publisher Elsevier as well of several small academic publishers.
You shouldn't trust anything just because it's published in a peer-reviewed journal. All that means (at best) is that it's sane, follows (or appears to follow) some minimal standards of scientific rigor and clarity. It doesn't mean the results (and especially the conclusions) are correct.
While CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC might be useful for other things, they are mostly awful sources of science news. Any science news reported here should be verified for accuracy. Pure garbage. The biggest purveyors of fake science news are Natural News, Mercola, The Food Babe, and InfoWars.
The key here is that you are provided access to the materials themselves. You can read journal articles and search through Elsevier's other available publications. Web of Science, on the other hand, provides citation data and pulls its information from multiple databases. It does not provide access to the articles...
With the proliferation of journal titles and frequent email solicitations for manuscripts, it can be challenging for authors to determine whether a journal is reputable. Many tools exist for identifying suitable journals where you can submit your manuscript.
ScienceDirect: Elsevier's premier platform of peer-reviewed scholarly literature. Advance research and scholarship with the world's leading database of peer-reviewed, full-text scientific, technical and health literature. Our intuitive features make it easy to stay informed and work more efficiently. Contact us. Sign in.