Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Tukey's range test, also known as Tukey's test, Tukey method, Tukey's honest significance test, or Tukey's HSD (honestly significant difference) test, [1] is a single-step multiple comparison procedure and statistical test.
The most common setting for Tukey's test of additivity is a two-way factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) with one observation per cell. The response variable Y ij is observed in a table of cells with the rows indexed by i = 1,..., m and the columns indexed by j = 1,..., n. The rows and columns typically correspond to various types and levels ...
Outside of such a specialized audience, the test output as shown below is rather challenging to interpret. Tukey's Range Test results for five West Coast cities rainfall data. The Tukey's range test uncovered that San Francisco & Spokane did not have statistically different rainfall mean (at the alpha = 0.05 level) with a p-value of 0.08.
Tukey defined data analysis in 1961 as: "Procedures for analyzing data, techniques for interpreting the results of such procedures, ways of planning the gathering of data to make its analysis easier, more precise or more accurate, and all the machinery and results of (mathematical) statistics which apply to analyzing data." [3]
[5] [6] Unlike Tukey's range test, the Newman–Keuls method uses different critical values for different pairs of mean comparisons. Thus, the procedure is more likely to reveal significant differences between group means and to commit type I errors by incorrectly rejecting a null hypothesis when it is true.
The median polish is a simple and robust exploratory data analysis procedure proposed by the statistician John Tukey.The purpose of median polish is to find an additively-fit model for data in a two-way layout table (usually, results from a factorial experiment) of the form row effect + column effect + overall median.
If in the case of treatment and control groups we were to use the more general Tukey's and Scheffé's methods, they can result in unnecessarily wide confidence intervals. Dunnett's test takes into consideration the special structure of comparing treatment against control, yielding narrower confidence intervals. [5]
If only a fixed number of pairwise comparisons are to be made, the Tukey–Kramer method will result in a more precise confidence interval. In the general case when many or all contrasts might be of interest, the Scheffé method is more appropriate and will give narrower confidence intervals in the case of a large number of comparisons.