Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Section 57 of the Constitution provides the procedure for the breaking of deadlocks between the House of Representatives and the Senate: If the House of Representatives passes any proposed law, and the Senate rejects or fails to pass it, or passes it with amendments to which the House of Representatives will not agree, and if after an interval of three months the House of Representatives, in ...
Western Australia v Commonwealth, [1] also known as the First Territory Senators' Case, was an important decision of the High Court of Australia concerning the procedure in section 57 of the Constitution and the representation of territories in the Senate.
Prior to the Act, the succession to the throne of Australia, like all Commonwealth realms, was controlled by a system of male-preference primogeniture, [8] under which succession passed first to the monarch's or nearest dynast's legitimate sons (and to their legitimate issue) in order of birth, and subsequently to their daughters and their legitimate issue, again in order of birth, so that ...
Section 57 of the Constitution of Australia concerns how deadlocks between the two houses of the Commonwealth Parliament—the House of Representatives and the Senate ...
The following is the order of precedence for Australia: . King of Australia: King Charles III [1]; Governor-General of Australia: Sam Mostyn; Governor of the State when within their own State.
Flag used by the New England New State Movement [1]. The New England New State Movement was an Australian political movement in the twentieth century. Founded as the Northern Separation Movement, the aim of the movement was to seek the secession of the New England region and surrounding areas from the State of New South Wales (NSW) and the establishment of a new State of New England.
The building houses the High Court of Australia (when it sits in Sydney), the Federal Court of Australia and the NSW Supreme Court. The building was designed by architects McConnel Smith and Johnson and received an RAIA Merit Award in 1977 and stands as a strong, singular statement representative of its time and a product of the brutalist ...
The Crown Lands Acts consisted of two separate acts: The Crown Lands Alienation Act of 1861 No 26a [1] and the Crown Lands Occupation Act of 1861 No 27a [2] These acts were amended in 1875 [3] and 1880. [4] The Robertson acts were replaced completely by new legislation with effect from the beginning of 1885. [5]