Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Unit fractions can also be expressed using negative exponents, as in 2 −1, which represents 1/2, and 2 −2, which represents 1/(2 2) or 1/4. A dyadic fraction is a common fraction in which the denominator is a power of two , e.g. 1 / 8 = 1 / 2 3 .
An irreducible fraction (or fraction in lowest terms, simplest form or reduced fraction) is a fraction in which the numerator and denominator are integers that have no other common divisors than 1 (and −1, when negative numbers are considered). [1] In other words, a fraction a / b is irreducible if and only if a and b are coprime ...
The reciprocal function y = 1 / x . As x approaches zero from the right, y tends to positive infinity. As x approaches zero from the left, y tends to negative infinity. In mathematics, division by zero, division where the divisor (denominator) is zero, is a unique and problematic special case.
It is unknown whether these constants are transcendental in general, but Γ( 1 / 3 ) and Γ( 1 / 4 ) were shown to be transcendental by G. V. Chudnovsky. Γ( 1 / 4 ) / 4 √ π has also long been known to be transcendental, and Yuri Nesterenko proved in 1996 that Γ( 1 / 4 ), π, and e π are algebraically independent.
A continued fraction is an expression of the form = + + + + + where the a n (n > 0) are the partial numerators, the b n are the partial denominators, and the leading term b 0 is called the integer part of the continued fraction.
Analytic continuation around the pole at s = 1 leads to a region of negative values, including ζ(−1) = − + 1 / 12 . In zeta function regularization, the series = is replaced by the series =. The latter series is an example of a Dirichlet series.
In general, if an increase of x percent is followed by a decrease of x percent, and the initial amount was p, the final amount is p (1 + 0.01 x)(1 − 0.01 x) = p (1 − (0.01 x) 2); hence the net change is an overall decrease by x percent of x percent (the square of the original percent change when expressed as a decimal number).
If exponentiation is considered as a multivalued function then the possible values of (−1 ⋅ −1) 1/2 are {1, −1}. The identity holds, but saying {1} = {(−1 ⋅ −1) 1/2 } is incorrect. The identity ( e x ) y = e xy holds for real numbers x and y , but assuming its truth for complex numbers leads to the following paradox , discovered ...