enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of file systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems

    No write support since Mac OS X 10.6 and no support at all since macOS 10.15 No Needs Paragon HFS+ [73] Yes No ? Yes No ? No No Apple HFS Plus: No Partial - writing support only to unjournalled FS Yes No Needs Paragon HFS+ [73] Yes from Mac OS 8.1: No ? with addon No ? No No FFS: No ? Yes No ? ? Yes ? ? ? ? ? No UFS1: No Partial - read only Yes No

  3. exFAT - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExFAT

    Windows 10 only allows formatting exFAT and NTFS on non-removeable volumes sized larger than 32 GB with the default user interface, and FAT32 format is suggested for smaller volumes; command-line utilities don't accept quick format using FAT32 if volume is larger than 32 GB. The standard exFAT implementation is not journaled and only uses a ...

  4. Hierarchical File System (Apple) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchical_File_System...

    For example, on a 1 GB disk, the allocation block size under HFS is 16 KB, so even a 1 byte file would take up 16 KB of disk space. This situation was less of a problem for users having large files (such as pictures, databases or audio) because these larger files wasted less space as a percentage of their file size.

  5. NTFS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS

    NTFS 1.0 is incompatible with 1.1 and newer: volumes written by Windows NT 3.5x cannot be read by Windows NT 3.1 until an update (available on the NT 3.5x installation media) is installed. [19] 1.1 Windows NT 3.5: 1994 Named streams and access control lists [20] NTFS compression support was added in Windows NT 3.51: 1.2 Windows NT 4.0: 1996

  6. List of default file systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_default_file_systems

    NTFS 1.1 1995: Windows 95: FAT16B with VFAT: 1996: Windows NT 4.0: NTFS 1.2 1998: Mac OS 8.1 / macOS: HFS Plus (HFS+) 1998: Windows 98: FAT32 with VFAT: 2000 SUSE Linux Enterprise 6.4 ReiserFS [1] [2] 2000: Windows Me: FAT32 with VFAT: 2000: Windows 2000: NTFS 3.0 2000: Ututo GNU/Linux: ext4: 2000: Knoppix: ext3: 2000: Red Hat Linux: ext3: 2001 ...

  7. Comparison of defragmentation software - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_de...

    NTFS Windows XP and later; Windows Server 2003 and later No [1] Yes No Yes, with Windows Task Scheduler: No Yes, with Windows Task Scheduler [a] 1.8 (July 4, 2016) [1] Defraggler: Piriform: Freeware: FAT32, NTFS, exFAT, ReFS [2] Windows XP and later Yes Yes No Yes, with Windows Task Scheduler [b] Yes Yes, with Windows Task Scheduler [a]

  8. File system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_system

    Windows makes use of the FAT, NTFS, exFAT, Live File System and ReFS file systems (the last of these is only supported and usable in Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, and Windows 10; Windows cannot boot from it). Windows uses a drive letter abstraction at the user level to distinguish one disk or partition from ...

  9. Large-file support - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large-file_support

    For example, the FAT32 file system does not support files larger than 4 GiB−1 (with older applications even only 2 GiB−1); the variant FAT32+ does support larger files (up to 256 GiB−1), but (so far) is only supported in some versions of DR-DOS, [2] [3] so users of Microsoft Windows have to use NTFS or exFAT instead.