Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
Editors request a peer review by putting {} onto an article's talk page. The template displays a choice of topics for the review which the user can choose from. Clicking on a topic will create a new page for the review. The new page is preloaded based on the article's topic from templates {{Peer review/preload1}} to {{Peer review/preload10}}
This page documents a template used by Wikipedia:Peer Review. For how editors use peer reviews, see WP:PR/Instructions . For an overview of the technical process, see Wikipedia:Peer review/Tools .
A book review may be a primary source, an opinion piece, a summary review, or a scholarly view. [2] Books can be reviewed for printed periodicals, magazines, and newspapers, as school work, or for book websites on the Internet. A book review's length may vary from a single paragraph to a substantial essay.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Pages for logged out editors learn more
This is a documentation subpage for Template:Review. It may contain usage information, categories and other content that is not part of the original template page. This template should be used when the article appears to have been written by a reviewer on behalf of the subject of the article, or having some connection with the subject.
AOL Search delivers comprehensive listings and one-click access to relevant videos, pictures, local maps and more.
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c : d (copyvio and plagiarism):