enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mallory_v._Norfolk...

   Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 600 U.S. 122 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a Pennsylvania law that requires out-of-state companies to agree to appear in Pennsylvania courts as a prerequisite to registering for business in the state is consistent with Due Process.

3. Vieth v. Jubelirer - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vieth_v._Jubelirer

   J. Bart DeLone from the Pennsylvania's Attorney General's Office represented Pedro Cortés and Monna Accurti (Commissioner of the Bureau of Commissions, Legislation and Elections) at the Supreme Court. He argued that even if the Court holds political gerrymandering justiciable, a districting scheme could only be found unconstitutional if "the ...

4. Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits...

   Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County C-48-CV-2020-6915 Dismissed Court denied oral motion. [35] [36] November 25, 2020: Kelly v. Pennsylvania: Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court No. 20A98 (US Supreme Ct.) 68 MAP 2020 (PA Supreme Ct.) 620 MD 2020 (PA Commonw. Ct.) Denied

5. Supreme Court allows Pennsylvania voters who mailed defective ...

   www.aol.com/supreme-court-allows-pennsylvania...

   The Supreme Court action marks "an important reaffirmation of the right to vote in Pennsylvania," said Ben Geffen, a lawyer who represented voters in the case. Justice Samuel Alito, one of the ...

6. William Penn School District v. Pennsylvania Department of ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Penn_School...

   William Penn School District et al. v. Pennsylvania Department of Education et al. was a landmark decision of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania on funding for public education by the Pennsylvania General Assembly. The Court ruled that the underfunding of rural and underprivileged school districts violated the Pennsylvania Constitution. [1]

7. Pennsylvania v. Muniz - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_v._Muniz

   The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court after the trial court ruled against Muniz, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed the trial court decision and ordered a new trial, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court declined to hear the case. [8] At issue in this case is whether the statements from Muniz were properly admissible at his trial.

8. List of court cases involving the American Civil Liberties ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_court_cases...

   Perry v. Schwarzenegger - Amicus curiae; private communications between officials in the organization were ordered to be released publicly as court evidence; Amnesty v. Blair - Amicus curiae [3] Davis v. Billington; 2013 Clapper v. Amnesty International; Missouri v. McNeely; United States v. Windsor; 2015 Ingersoll v. Arlene's Flowers; ACLU and ...

9. AOL Mail

   mail.aol.com

   Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!