enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifteenth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Fifteenth Amendment in the National Archives. Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. Section 2.

  3. The 15th Amendment was a milestone for civil rights. The amendment was ratified in February 1870. We had just fought a Civil War, ending in 1865, where soldiers fought brother against brother and ...

  4. Guinn v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinn_v._United_States

    Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347 (1915), was a United States Supreme Court decision that found certain grandfather clause exemptions to literacy tests for voting rights to be unconstitutional. Though these grandfather clauses were superficially race-neutral, they were designed to protect the voting rights of illiterate white voters while ...

  5. Reconstruction Amendments - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconstruction_Amendments

    Text of the 15th Amendment. The Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the federal and state governments from denying a citizen the right to vote based on that citizen's "race, color, or previous condition of servitude." It was ratified on February 3, 1870, as the third and last of the Reconstruction Amendments.

  6. Rice v. Cayetano - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_v._Cayetano

    XV. Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495 (2000), was a case filed in 1996 by Big Island rancher Harold "Freddy" Rice against the state of Hawaii and argued before the United States Supreme Court. In 2000, the Court ruled that the state could not restrict eligibility to vote in elections for the Board of Trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs to ...

  7. South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Carolina_v._Katzenbach

    South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that rejected a challenge from the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach). [1]

  8. List of amendments to the Constitution of the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_amendments_to_the...

    The first ten amendments were adopted and ratified simultaneously and are known collectively as the Bill of Rights. The 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments are collectively known as the Reconstruction Amendments. Six amendments adopted by Congress and sent to the states have not been ratified by the required number of states.

  9. United States v. Cruikshank - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Cruikshank

    United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court [1] ruling that the U.S. Bill of Rights did not limit the power of private actors or state governments despite the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. It reversed the federal criminal convictions for the civil rights violations ...