Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, 592 U.S (2021), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with nominal damages to be awarded to individuals whose right to freedom of speech has been suppressed by an entity but subsequently rendered moot due to intervening circumstances.
Runners carrying the Supreme Court's Obergefell v.Hodges decision on marriage equality (2015). The running of the interns was a Washington, DC, tradition, sometimes called a race, [1] involving interns of news outlets running to deliver results of major decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States to the press.
A background article written by CNN's legal analyst & Supreme Court biographer Joan Biskupic who details the decision-making process leading to the landmark court decision in R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Archived from the original on November 13, 2020. Retrieved on November 24, 2020.
The Supreme Court on July 1, 2024, kept on hold efforts by Texas and Florida to limit how Facebook, TikTok, X, YouTube and other social media platforms regulate content in a ruling that strongly ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
In an order issued Wednesday afternoon, Associate Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito said the court would extend its previous stay on the matter, issued on April 14, until 11:59 p.m. on Friday.
Court historians and other legal scholars consider each chief justice who presides over the Supreme Court of the United States to be the head of an era of the Court. [1] These lists are sorted chronologically by chief justice and include most major cases decided by the court.
T he Supreme Court on Monday provided former President Donald Trump with significant legal protection against prosecution for actions taken during his tenure in the Oval Office.. In a ruling split ...