enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uzuegbunam_v._Preczewski

    Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, 592 U.S (2021), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with nominal damages to be awarded to individuals whose right to freedom of speech has been suppressed by an entity but subsequently rendered moot due to intervening circumstances.

  3. 2024 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_term_opinions_of_the...

    8/8 0 0 0 0 0 Associate Justice: Clarence Thomas: George H. W. Bush: October 15, 1991 75% 6/8 0 0 0 1 1 Associate Justice: Samuel Alito: George W. Bush: January 31, 2006 100% 8/8 0 1 0 0 1 Associate Justice: Sonia Sotomayor: Barack Obama: August 6, 2009 100% 8/8 0 0 1 0 1 Associate Justice: Elena Kagan: Barack Obama: August 7, 2010 100% 8/8 1 0 ...

  4. Pereira v. Sessions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pereira_v._Sessions

    Pereira v. Sessions, Attorney General, no. 17-459, 585 U.S (2018), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding immigration.In an 8-1 majority, the Court reversed a lower court’s decision by ruling that a Notice to Appear which does not inform a noncitizen when and where to appear for a removal proceeding is not valid under 8 U.S. Code § 1229(b) and therefore does not trigger the stop ...

  5. Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban: Read the full SCOTUS decision

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-upholds-tiktok...

    Read TikTok CEO's full response to SCOTUS decision. In a post to the official TikTok and X accounts made around 12:30 p.m. ET, roughly two and a half hours after the SCOTUS decision was announced ...

  6. DeVillier v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devillier_v._Texas

    DeVillier v. Texas, 601 U.S. 285 (2024), was a case that the Supreme Court of the United States decided on April 16, 2024. [1] [2] The case dealt with the Supreme Court's takings clause jurisprudence. Because the case touched on whether or not the 5th Amendment is self-executing, the case had implications for Trump v.

  7. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's...

    The Supreme Court confirmed the draft's authenticity the next day; at the same time, the Supreme Court's press release said that "it does not represent a decision by the Court or the final position of any member on the issues in the case". [105] [106] [107] In response to the leak, Roberts said, "The work of the Court will not be affected in ...

  8. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Employment...

    Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, 575 U.S. 768 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding a Muslim American woman, Samantha Elauf, who was refused a job at Abercrombie & Fitch in 2008 because she wore a headscarf, which conflicted with the company's dress code. [1] The Supreme Court of the United States ruled 81 in Elauf's favor on ...

  9. Supreme Court refuses to revive Biden's latest student loan ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-refuses-revive...

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Wednesday rebuffed a Biden administration plea seeking to revive the latest plan to tackle federal student loan debt.. The court in a brief order denied an ...