enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_v._Farmers'_Loan_...

    Statue of John H Reagan, a Texas Railroad Commissioner involved in the case. Reagan v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. was a United States Supreme Court legal case that was submitted to the court on March 23, 1893, took place in 1894, and is revered in the history of American constitutional law.

  3. Is it illegal for trains to block railroad crossings in Texas ...

    www.aol.com/illegal-trains-block-railroad...

    The Texas Transportation Code used to impose a criminal penalty against railway companies that blocked a street, railroad crossing or public highway for more than 10 minutes.

  4. Missouri, Kansas, & Texas Railway Co. of Texas v. May

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri,_Kansas,_&_Texas...

    Missouri, Kansas, [] & Texas Railway Company of Texas v. Clay May, 194 U.S. 267 (1904), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that a Texas law did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by penalizing only railroad companies for allowing certain weeds to mature and go to seed on their land.

  5. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houston_East_&_West_Texas...

    The Houston East and West Texas Railway Company managed an interstate railway line that ran through Dallas and Marshall, Texas (on the eastern border of Texas), and Shreveport, Louisiana. The freight shipping rates "on wagons" from Marshall to Dallas, a distance of 148 miles, was 36.8 cents, and the rate from Marshall to Shreveport, a distance ...

  6. Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erie_Railroad_Co._v._Tompkins

    Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that the United States does not have a general federal common law and that U.S. federal courts must apply state law, not federal law, to lawsuits between parties from different states that do not involve federal questions.

  7. Railroad operations resume after 5-day closure in 2 Texas ...

    www.aol.com/news/railroad-operations-resume-5...

    The federal government on Friday reopened two cross-border railroad crossings in Texas, five days after the shuttering of rail operations there disrupted trade and sparked outrage from U.S. and ...

  8. Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railroad_Commission_v...

    Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. , 312 U.S. 496 (1941), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court determined that it was appropriate for United States federal courts to abstain from hearing a case in order to allow state courts to decide substantial Constitutional issues that touch upon sensitive areas of state social policy.

  9. Article X of the Texas Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_X_of_the_Texas...

    Since only Texas companies could operate in the state, the outside companies could not lease the Texas companies, as decided by the courts in an 1888 lawsuit brought by Attorney General James S. Hogg against the railroads controlled by Jay Gould (International and Great Northern Railroad, Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway, and Texas and ...