Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The 2016 version of this article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding academic peer reviewed article was published in Gene and can be cited as: Geoffrey W Abbott (30 July 2016). "KCNE4 and KCNE5: K(+) channel regulation and cardiac arrhythmogenesis". Gene. Gene Wiki Review Series. 593 (2): 249–260.
A database of biomedical and life sciences literature with access to full-text research articles and citations. [56] Includes text-mining tools and links to external molecular and medical data sets. A partner in PMC International. [57] Free EMBL-EBI [58] FSTA – Food Science and Technology Abstracts: Food science, food technology, nutrition
A review article is an article that summarizes the current state of understanding on a topic within a certain discipline. [1] [2] A review article is generally considered a secondary source since it may analyze and discuss the method and conclusions in previously published studies.
The 2016 version of this article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding academic peer reviewed article was published in Gene and can be cited as: Geoffrey W Abbott (30 July 2016). "KCNE4 and KCNE5: K(+) channel regulation and cardiac arrhythmogenesis". Gene. Gene Wiki Review Series. 593 (2): 249–260.
Several academic journals now provide a dual-publishing model where suitable academic review articles are published as a stable, indexed version of record, and also copied as a Wikipedia page. [2] These generate a citeable version of the article for the author as well as providing peer-reviewed content for the encyclopedia.
Academic publishing is the subfield of publishing which distributes academic research and scholarship. Most academic work is published in academic journal articles, books or theses. The part of academic written output that is not formally published but merely printed up or posted on the Internet is often called "grey literature".
A fourth type of review of literature (the scientific literature) is the systematic review but it is not called a literature review, which absent further specification, conventionally refers to narrative reviews. A systematic review focuses on a specific research question to identify, appraise, select, and synthesize all high-quality research ...
This page is an attempt to offer a simpler alternative to Wikipedia:Scientific peer review. If you wish to have an article reviewed by an expert (or better, two experts) in the subject, simply find an appropriate expert and ask them to review the article.