Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Two cases arise: The first case is theoretical: when you know all the coefficients then you take certain limits and find the precise radius of convergence.; The second case is practical: when you construct a power series solution of a difficult problem you typically will only know a finite number of terms in a power series, anywhere from a couple of terms to a hundred terms.
In mathematics, the Cauchy–Hadamard theorem is a result in complex analysis named after the French mathematicians Augustin Louis Cauchy and Jacques Hadamard, describing the radius of convergence of a power series. It was published in 1821 by Cauchy, [1] but remained relatively unknown until Hadamard rediscovered it. [2]
The convergence criteria of the power series then apply, requiring ‖ ‖ to be sufficiently small under the appropriate matrix norm. For more general problems, which cannot be rewritten in such a way that the two matrices commute, the ordering of matrix products produced by repeated application of the Leibniz rule must be tracked.
The spectral radius is closely related to the behavior of the convergence of the power sequence of a matrix; namely as shown by the following theorem. Theorem. Let A ∈ C n×n with spectral radius ρ(A). Then ρ(A) < 1 if and only if =
For instance it is not true that if two power series = and = have the same radius of convergence, then = (+) also has this radius of convergence: if = and = + (), for instance, then both series have the same radius of convergence of 1, but the series = (+) = = has a radius of convergence of 3.
Excluding these cases, the ratio test can be applied to determine the radius of convergence. If p < q + 1 then the ratio of coefficients tends to zero. This implies that the series converges for any finite value of z and thus defines an entire function of z. An example is the power series for the exponential function.
The utility of Abel's theorem is that it allows us to find the limit of a power series as its argument (that is, ) approaches from below, even in cases where the radius of convergence, , of the power series is equal to and we cannot be sure whether the limit should be finite or not.
are also analytic, since their defining power series have the same radius of convergence as the original series. Assuming that [a − r, a + r] ⊂ I and r < R, all these series converge uniformly on (a − r, a + r).