enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrews_v_Law_Society_of...

    Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 SCR 143 is the first Supreme Court of Canada case to deal with the equality rights provided under Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. British law graduate Mark David Andrews challenged the validity of Section 42 of the Barristers and Solicitors Act contending that the ...

  3. Supreme Court of British Columbia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_British...

    November, 2013. The Supreme Court of British Columbia is the superior trial court for the province of British Columbia, Canada. The Court hears civil and criminal law cases as well as appeals from the Provincial Court of British Columbia. There are 90 judicial positions on the Court in addition to supernumerary judges, making for a grand total ...

  4. Court system of Canada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_system_of_Canada

    The court system of Canada is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. In the courts, the judiciary interpret and apply the law of Canada. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial. The Constitution of Canada gives the federal Parliament of Canada ...

  5. Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia (AG) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auton_(Guardian_ad_litem...

    Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia (AG), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 657, 2004 SCC 78 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada wherein the Court ruled that government funding for non-core medically necessary treatments is not protected under section 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

  6. British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbia_(Public...

    British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v British Columbia Government Service Employees' Union [1999] 3 SCR 3, 1999 SCC 48 – called Meiorin for short – is a Supreme Court of Canada case that created a unified test to determine if a violation of human rights legislation can be justified as a bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR).

  7. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) v British Columbia (Council of Human Rights), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 868, known as the Grismer Estate case, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on human rights law. The Court held that the British Columbia Superintendent of Motor Vehicles was in violation of the provincial Human Rights Code ...

  8. Cambie Surgeries Corporation v British Columbia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambie_Surgeries...

    Decision by. Justice John J. Steeves [ 1] Cambie Surgeries Corporation v British Columbia [2020 BCSC 1310] was a high-profile, multi-year Supreme Court of British Columbia (BCSC) case brought by Brian Day, an advocate for private healthcare, against the province of British Columbia. Day, who runs the Vancouver -based private clinic Cambie ...

  9. Comparator groups analysis in Canadian equality law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparator_groups_analysis...

    Law Society of British Columbia was the first Supreme Court of Canada judgment to articulate the framework for analysis of Charter equality claims. The Court formulated a test requiring that the claimant prove that differential treatment on a ground enumerated in section 15 or on an "analogous" ground had occurred and the treatment had caused ...