Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Sometimes a speaker or writer uses a fallacy intentionally. In any context, including academic debate, a conversation among friends, political discourse, advertising, or comedic purposes, the arguer may use fallacious reasoning to try to persuade the listener or reader, by means other than offering relevant evidence, that the conclusion is true.
Sometimes called the "I-knew-it-all-along" effect, or the "Hindsight is 20/20" effect, is the tendency to see past events as having been predictable [99] before they happened. Impact bias The tendency to overestimate the length or the intensity of the impact of future feeling states.
In some dialects of spoken English, of and the contracted form of have, 've, sound alike. However, in standard written English, they are not interchangeable. Standard: Susan would have stopped to eat, but she was running late. Standard: You could have warned me! Non-standard: I should of known that the store would be closed. (Should be "I ...
"The tiger (Subject) is (Copula) a four-footed (Immediate Predicate) animal." (Mediate Predicate) {"The tiger} is {a four-footed} animal." (Subject) (Copula) {(Immediate Predicate)} {(Mediate Predicate)} In order to have clear knowledge of the relation between a predicate and a subject, one can consider a predicate to be a mediate (or indirect [mittelbares]) predicate. Between this mediate ...
Mistaken Identity: Two Families, One Survivor, Unwavering Hope is a best-selling non-fiction book [1] describing an incident in which the identities of two young female casualties were confused after a vehicle crash. It was published by Howard Books on March 25, 2008. The book lists its authors as Don and Susie van Ryn; Newell, Colleen and ...
A close relative/variant of the appeal to tradition is the argument from inertia or appeal to inertia (sometimes called "Stay the Course"), which states a mistaken status quo, potentially related to existing customs be maintained for its own sake, usually because making a change would require admission of fault in the mistake or because correcting the mistake would require extraordinary effort ...
The individual essays in this book include: Part One: "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat", about Dr. P., a singer and music teacher who has visual agnosia.He perceives separate features of objects, but cannot correctly identify them or the whole objects that they are part of.
Since Jaakko Hintikka's seminal treatment of the problem, [7] it has become standard to present Moore's paradox by explaining why it is absurd to assert sentences that have the logical form: "P and NOT(I believe that P)" or "P and I believe that NOT-P." Philosophers refer to these, respectively, as the omissive and commissive versions of Moore's paradox.